Ferritic Stainless Steel with Excellent Oxidation Resistance, Good High Temperature Strength, and Good Formability

ABSTRACT

Ferritic stainless steels with good oxidation resistance, and good high temperature strength and good formability are produced with Ti addition and low Al content for room temperature formability resulting from equiaxed as-cast grain structures. Columbium (niobium) and copper are added for high temperature strength. Silicon and manganese are added for oxidation resistance. The ferritic stainless steels provide better oxidation resistance than ferritic stainless steels of 18Cr-2Mo and 15Cr—Cb—Ti—Si—Mn. In addition, they are generally less costly to produce than 18Cr-2Mo.

This application is a non-provisional patent application claiming priority from provisional application Ser. No. 61/695,771, entitled “Ferritic Stainless Steels with Excellent Oxidation Resistance with Good High Temperature Strength and Good Formability,” filed on Aug. 31, 2012. The disclosure of application Ser. No. 61/695,771 is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND

It is desirable to produce a ferritic stainless steel with oxidation resistance, high temperature strength, and good formability characteristics. Columbium and copper are added in amounts to provide high temperature strength, and silicon and manganese are added in amounts to provide oxidation resistance. The present ferritic stainless steel provides better oxidation resistance than known stainless steels such as 18Cr-2Mo and 15Cr—Cb—Ti—Si—Mn. In addition, the present ferritic stainless steel is less expensive to manufacture than other stainless steels such as 18Cr-2Mo.

SUMMARY

The present ferritic stainless steel are produced with titanium additions and low aluminum concentration to provide room temperature formability from equiaxed as-cast grain structures, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,855,213 and 5,868,875, the complete disclosures of which are each incorporated by reference herein. Columbium and copper are added to the ferritic stainless steel for high temperature strength and silicon and manganese are added to improve oxidation resistance.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The ferritic stainless steel is produced using process conditions known in the art for use in manufacturing ferritic stainless steels, such as the processes described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,855,213 and 5,868,875. Columbium and copper are added to the ferritic stainless steel for high temperature strength and silicon and manganese are added to improve oxidation resistance. It can be produced from material having an as-cast structure of fine equiaxed grains.

A ferrous melt for the ferritic stainless steel is provided in a melting furnace such as an electric arc furnace. This ferrous melt may be formed in the melting furnace from solid iron bearing scrap, carbon steel scrap, stainless steel scrap, solid iron containing materials including iron oxides, iron carbide, direct reduced iron, hot briquetted iron, or the melt may be produced upstream of the melting furnace in a blast furnace or any other iron smelting unit capable of providing a ferrous melt. The ferrous melt then will be refined in the melting furnace or transferred to a refining vessel such as an argon-oxygen-decarburization vessel or a vacuum-oxygen-decarburization vessel, followed by a trim station such as a ladle metallurgy furnace or a wire feed station.

In some embodiments, the steel is cast from a melt containing sufficient titanium and nitrogen but a controlled amount of aluminum for forming small titanium oxide inclusions to provide the necessary nuclei for forming the as-cast equiaxed grain structure so that an annealed sheet produced from this steel also has enhanced ridging characteristics.

In some embodiments, titanium is added to the melt for deoxidation prior to casting. Deoxidation of the melt with titanium forms small titanium oxide inclusions that provide the nuclei that result in an as-cast equiaxed fine grain structure. To minimize formation of alumina inclusions, i.e., aluminum oxide, Al₂O₃, aluminum may not be added to this refined melt as a deoxidant. In some embodiments, titanium and nitrogen can be present in the melt prior to casting so that the ratio of the product of titanium and nitrogen divided by residual aluminum is at least about 0.14.

If the steel is to be stabilized, sufficient amount of the titanium beyond that required for deoxidation can be added for combining with carbon and nitrogen in the melt but preferably less than that required for saturation with nitrogen, i.e., in a sub-equilibrium amount, thereby avoiding or at least minimizing precipitation of large titanium nitride inclusions before solidification. The maximum amount of titanium for “sub-equilibrium” is generally illustrated in FIG. 4 of U.S. Pat. No. 4,964,926, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In some embodiments, one or more stabilizing elements such as columbium, zirconium, tantalum and vanadium can be added to the melt as well.

The cast steel is hot processed into a sheet. For this disclosure, the term “sheet” is meant to include continuous strip or cut lengths formed from continuous strip and the term “hot processed” means the as-cast steel will be reheated, if necessary, and then reduced to a predetermined thickness such as by hot rolling. If hot rolled, a steel slab is reheated to 2000° to 2350° F. (1093°-1288° C.), hot rolled using a finishing temperature of 1500-1800° F. (816-982° C.) and coiled at a temperature of 1000-1400° F. (538-760° C.). The hot rolled sheet is also known as the “hot band.” In some embodiments, the hot band may be annealed at a peak metal temperature of 1700-2100° F. (926-1149° C.). In some embodiments, the hot band may be descaled and cold reduced at least 40% to a desired final sheet thickness. In other embodiments, the hot band may be descaled and cold reduced at least 50% to a desired final sheet thickness. Thereafter, the cold reduced sheet can be final annealed at a peak metal temperature of 1800-2100° F. (982-1149° C.).

The ferritic stainless steel can be produced from a hot processed sheet made by a number of methods. The sheet can be produced from slabs formed from ingots or continuous cast slabs of 50-200 mm thickness which are reheated to 2000° to 2350° F. (1093°-1288° C.) followed by hot rolling to provide a starting hot processed sheet of 1-7 mm thickness or the sheet can be hot processed from strip continuously cast into thicknesses of 2-26 mm. The present process is applicable to sheet produced by methods wherein continuous cast slabs or slabs produced from ingots are fed directly to a hot rolling mill with or without significant reheating, or ingots hot reduced into slabs of sufficient temperature to be hot rolled in to sheet with or without further reheating.

Titanium is used for deoxidation of the ferritic stainless steel melt prior to casting. The amount of titanium in the melt can be 0.30% or less. Unless otherwise expressly stated, all concentrations stated as “%” are percent by weight. In some embodiments, titanium can be present in a sub-equilibrium amount. As used herein, the term “sub-equilibrium” means the amount of titanium is controlled so that the solubility product of the titanium compounds formed are below the saturation level at the steel liquidus temperature thereby avoiding excessive titanium nitride precipitation in the melt. Excessive nitrogen is not a problem for those manufacturers that refine ferritic stainless steel melts in an argon oxygen decarburization vessel. Nitrogen substantially below 0.010% can be obtained when refining the stainless steel in an argon oxygen decarburization vessel thereby allowing increased amount of titanium to be tolerated and still be at sub-equilibrium.

To provide the nucleation sites necessary for forming as-cast equiaxed ferrite grains, sufficient time after adding the titanium to the melt should elapse to allow the titanium oxide inclusions to form before casting the melt. If the melt is cast immediately after adding titanium, the as-cast structure of the casting can include larger columnar grains. The amount of time that should elapse can be determined by one of ordinary skill in the art without undue experimentation. Ingots cast in the laboratory less than 5 minutes after adding the titanium to the melt had large as-cast columnar grains even when the product of titanium and nitrogen divided by residual aluminum was at least 0.14.

Sufficient nitrogen should be present in the steel prior to casting so that the ratio of the product of titanium and nitrogen divided by aluminum is at least about 0.14. In some embodiments, the amount of nitrogen present in the melt is ≦0.020%.

Although nitrogen concentrations after melting in an electric arc furnace may be as high as 0.05%, the amount of dissolved N can be reduced during argon gas refining in an argon oxygen decarburization vessel to less than 0.02%. Precipitation of excessive TiN can be avoided by reducing the sub-equilibrium amount of Ti to be added to the melt for any given nitrogen content. Alternatively, the amount of nitrogen in the melt can be reduced in an argon oxygen decarburization vessel for an anticipated amount of Ti contained in the melt.

Total residual aluminum can be controlled or minimized relative to the amounts of titanium and nitrogen. Minimum amounts of titanium and nitrogen must be present in the melt relative to the aluminum. The ratio of the product of titanium and nitrogen divided by residual aluminum can be at least about 0.14 in some embodiments, and at least 0.23 in other embodiments. To minimize the amounts of titanium and nitrogen required in the melt, the amount of aluminum is <0.020% in some embodiments. In other embodiments, the amount of aluminum is ≦0.013% and in other embodiments, it is reduced to ≦0.010%. If aluminum is not purposefully alloyed with the melt during refining or casting such as for deoxidation immediately prior to casting, total aluminum can be controlled or reduced to less than 0.020%. One must be aware that aluminum can be inadvertently added to the melt as an impurity present in an alloy addition of another element, e.g., titanium. Titanium alloys may contain as much as 20% Al which may contribute total Al to the melt. By carefully controlling the refining and casting practices, a melt containing <0.020% aluminum can be obtained.

In addition to using titanium for stabilization, other suitable stabilizing elements may also include columbium, zirconium, tantalum, vanadium or mixtures thereof. In some embodiments, if a second stabilizing element is used in combination with titanium, e.g., columbium or vanadium, this second stabilizing element may be limited to ≦0.50% when deep formability is required. Some embodiments include columbium in concentrations of 0.05% or less. Some embodiments include columbium in concentrations of 0.28-0.43%. Vanadium can be present in amounts less than 0.5%. Some embodiments of the ferritic stainless steels include 0.008-0.098% vanadium.

Copper improves high temperature strength. The ferritic stainless steels contain 1.0-2.0% copper. Some embodiments include 1.16-1.31% copper.

Silicon is generally present in the ferritic stainless steels in an amount of 1.0-1.7%. In some embodiments, silicon is present in an amount of 1.27-1.35%. A small amount of silicon generally is present in a ferritic stainless steel to promote formation of the ferrite phase. Silicon also enhances high temperature oxidation resistance and provides high temperature strength. In most embodiments, silicon does not exceed about 1.7% because the steel can become too hard and the elongation can be adversely affected.

Manganese is present in the ferritic stainless steel in an amount of 0.4-1.5%. In some embodiments, manganese is present in an amount of 0.98-1.00%. Manganese improves oxidation resistance and spalling resistance at high temperatures. Accordingly, some embodiments include manganese in amounts of at least 0.4%. However, manganese is an austenite former and affects the stabilization of the ferrite phase. If the amount of manganese exceeds about 1.5%, the stabilization and formability of the steel can be affected.

Carbon is present in the ferritic stainless steel in an amount of up to 0.02%. In some embodiments, the carbon content is ≦0.02%. In still other embodiments, it is 0.0010-0.01%.

Chromium is present some embodiments of the ferritic stainless steels in an amount of 15-20%. If chromium is greater than about 25%, the formability of the steel can be reduced.

In some embodiments, oxygen is present in the steel in an amount <100 ppm. When a steel melt is prepared sequentially in an argon oxygen decarburization refining vessel and a ladle metallurgy furnace alloying vessel, oxygen in the melt can be within the range of 10-60 ppm thereby providing a very clean steel having small titanium oxide inclusions that aid in forming the nucleation sites responsible for the fine as-cast equiaxed grain structure.

Sulfur is present in the ferritic stainless steel in an amount of ≦0.01%.

Phosphorus can deteriorate formability in hot rolling and can cause pitting. It is present in the ferritic stainless steel in an amount of ≦0.05%.

Like manganese, nickel is an austenite former and affects the stabilization of the ferrite phase. Accordingly, in some embodiments, nickel is limited to ≦1.0%. In some embodiments, nickel is present in amounts of 0.13-0.19%.

Molybdenum also improves corrosion resistance. Some embodiments include 3.0% or less molybdenum. Some embodiments include 0.03-0.049% molybdenum.

For some applications, it may be desirable to include boron in the steels of the present invention in an amount of ≦0.010%. In some embodiments, boron is present in an amount of 0.0001-0.002%. Boron can improve the resistance to secondary work embrittlement of steel so that the steel sheet will be less likely to split during deep drawing applications and multi-step forming applications.

In some embodiments, the ferritic stainless steels may also include other elements known in the art of steelmaking that can be made either as deliberate additions or present as residual elements, i.e., impurities from steelmaking process.

Example 1

Embodiments of the ferritic stainless steels and comparative reference steels were made in the laboratory with the compositions set forth in Table 1 below.

The materials identified as “Lab Materials” were processed on laboratory equipment according to the following parameters. Each ingot was reheated to a temperature of 2300° F. (1260° C.). It was hot rolled to a strip thickness of 0.200″ (5.08 mm). It was then hot band annealed at a temperature of 1825-1975° C. (996-1079° C.). It was then cold rolled to a thickness of 0.079-0.098″ (2.0-2.5 mm). The cold rolled strip was final annealed to a temperature of 1885-1950° F. (1029-1066° C.).

The materials identified as “Plant Material” were processed on production equipment in the plant according to the following parameters. Each slab was reheated to a temperature of 2273-2296° F. (1245-1258° C.). It was then hot rolled to a strip thickness of 0.200-0.180″ (5.08-4.57 mm). The hot rolled strip was then hot band annealed to a temperature of 1950-2000° F. (1066-1083° C.). After cold rolling to 0.079-0.059″ (2.0-1.5 mm), the strip was final annealed to a temperature of 1900-2000° F. (1038-1093° C.).

TABLE 1 Chemical compositions in weight %. ID Description Al B C Cb Cr Cu Mn Mo N Ni P S Si Ti V Remarks V3924 Lab Material .007 <.0005 .0090 .40 16.70 1.27 1.00 .048 .019 .16 .031 .0016 1.27 .14 .071 Invention V3925 Lab Material .009 <.0005 .0054 .43 16.98 1.31 1.00 .049 .012 .16 .033 .0014 1.33 .21 .074 Invention V3926 Lab Material .010 <.0005 .0077 .43 16.90 1.28 1.00 .048 .012 .16 .031 .0016 1.31 .25 .080 Invention V3929 Lab Material .014 <.0005 .0094 .40 16.56 1.26 .98 .048 .014 .15 .030 .0015 1.28 .17 .073 Invention V3954 Lab Material .006 .0020 .014 .30 16.99 1.27 .99 .048 .012 .14 .027 .0016 1.33 .16 .008 Invention V3955 Lab Material .010 <.0005 .0085 .28 17.06 1.23 .99 .049 .0082 .14 .028 .0016 1.35 .16 .082 Invention V3956 Lab Material .016 <.0005 .0089 .39 16.92 1.23 .99 .048 .0087 .14 .026 .0017 1.32 .17 .078 Invention V3957 Lab Material .015 .0017 .0084 .41 16.90 1.28 .99 .048 .0084 .14 .026 .0016 1.32 .17 .075 Invention V3958 Lab Material .016 .0017 .0090 .40 16.93 1.24 .99 .048 .0076 .14 .027 .0017 1.32 .16 .078 Invention V3959 Lab Material .009 .0020 .0082 .31 17.35 1.27 .99 .049 .0077 .13 .026 .0018 1.31 .15 .078 Invention V3960 Lab Material .007 .0007 .0085 .37 17.40 1.27 .99 .048 .0086 .14 .026 .0017 1.33 .16 .078 Invention V3961 Lab Material .008 <.0005 .013 .29 16.95 1.28 .99 .048 .011 .14 .025 .0016 1.32 .16 .074 Invention V3962 Lab Material .009 .0019 .0093 .30 16.93 1.28 .99 .048 .0082 .14 .026 .0016 1.33 .17 .078 Invention HT Plant Material .010 .0001 .0114 .33 17.01 1.16 .98 .030 .009 .19 .026 .0015 1.30 .18 .098 Invention #920097 V3918 Lab Material .012 <.0005 .012 .44 16.78 1.28 .28 .048 .010 .16 .031 .0015 .58 .21 .076 Reference V3920 Lab Material .012 <.0005 .011 .46 16.88 1.28 .28 .049 .010 .16 .031 .0017 .94 .25 .076 Reference V3921 Lab Material .012 <.0005 .0081 .45 16.82 1.28 .28 .049 .010 .16 .030 .0015 1.34 .27 .078 Reference V3922 Lab Material .009 <.0005 .0084 .32 16.86 1.28 .28 .048 .010 .16 .030 .0014 1.32 .27 .080 Reference HT Plant Material .009 .0060 .010 .17 17.58 .09 .35 1.90 .0114 .23 .022 .0005 .44 .20 .066 Reference #831187 (444) HT Plant Material .010 .0002 .0086 .37 14.32 .08 1.01 .010 .0077 .14 .022 .0010 1.27 .25 .045 Reference #830843 (15 Cr-Cb)

The materials identified as “Invention” in the remarks are embodiments of the ferritic stainless steels of the present disclosure. The materials identified as “Reference” are not embodiments of the ferritic stainless steels of the present disclosure. In fact, two are well-known prior products: HT #831187 is Type 444 stainless steel and HT #830843 is 15 CrCb stainless steel, which is a product of AK Steel Corporation, West Chester, Ohio.

Example 2

The oxidation resistance of several of the steel compositions described in Example 1 and Table 1 above was tested at 930° C. for 200 hours in air. The results of the tests are set forth in Table 2 below. The individual compositions are each identified by their respective ID number. The oxidation resistance was evaluated two factors. One was the amount of weight gain, and the other was degree of spalling. For each material, except HT #920097, the reported weight gain value is an average of two tests. For HT #9200097, eight samples were tested and the minimum, average, and maximum of these eight tests has been reported.

TABLE 2 Oxidation resistance test results at 930° C. for 200 hours in air. Chemical Composition (weight %) Weight Gain Spalling C Cb Cr Cu Mn N Si Ti (mg/cm²) (Scale Off) Remarks V3954 .014 .30 16.99 1.27 .99 .012 1.33 .16 1.34 No Invention V3924 .0090 .40 16.70 1.27 1.00 .019 1.27 .14 1.40 No Invention V3929 .0094 .40 16.56 1.26 .98 .014 1.28 .17 1.44 No Invention V3956 .0089 .39 16.92 1.23 .99 .0087 1.32 .17 1.14 Partial* Invention V3955 .0085 .28 17.06 1.23 .99 .0082 1.35 .16 1.15 Partial* Invention V3961 .013 .29 16.95 1.28 .99 .011 1.32 .16 1.17 Partial* Invention V3960 .0085 .37 17.40 1.27 .99 .0086 1.33 .16 1.19 Partial* Invention V3958 .0090 .40 16.93 1.24 .99 .0076 1.32 .16 1.20 Partial* Invention V3957 .0084 .41 16.90 1.28 .99 .0084 1.32 .17 1.21 Partial* Invention V3959 .0082 .31 17.35 1.27 .99 .0077 1.31 .15 1.22 Partial* Invention V3962 .0093 .30 16.93 1.28 .99 .0082 1.33 .17 1.37 Partial* Invention V3925 .0054 .43 16.98 1.31 1.00 .012 1.33 .21 1.43 Partial* Invention V3926 .0077 .43 16.90 1.28 1.00 .012 1.31 .25 1.47 Partial* Invention HT #920097 .0114 .33 17.01 1.16 .98 .009 1.30 .18 1.63 Min 1.70 Ave No Invention 1.74 Max V3918 .012 .44 16.78 1.28 .28 .010 .58 .21 −0.14 Severe Reference V3920 .011 .46 16.88 1.28 .28 .010 .94 .25 −1.77 Very Sever Reference V3922 .0084 .32 16.86 1.28 .28 .010 1.32 .27 −1.98 Very Sever Reference V3921 .0081 .45 16.82 1.28 .28 .010 1.34 .27 −2.48 Very Sever Reference 444 .010 .17 17.58 .09 .35 .0114 .44 .20 0.88 Severe Reference 15Cr-Cb .0086 .37 14.32 .08 1.01 .0077 1.27 .25 1.29 Severe Reference *“Partial” means that spalling occurred just around the edges of the specimens and a few small spots away from the edges.

Example 3

The longitudinal high temperature tensile properties of several of the steel compositions of Example 1 were tested according to the procedure of ASTM Standard E21 tensile test. The results of these tests are set forth below:

TABLE 3 Longitudinal high temperature tensile properties. (ASTM Standard E21 tensile tests). 600° C. 700° C. 800° C. Average Gauge .2% YS UTS Gauge .2% YS UTS Gauge .2% YS UTS .2% YS at ID (mm) (MPa) (MPa) (mm) (MPa) (MPa) (mm) (MPa) (MPa) Three Temp. Remarks V3924 2.03 260 372 2.00 116 126 2.03 37.2 46.9 138 Invention V3925 2.01 241 391 2.05 151 160 2.01 41.0 50.6 144 Invention V3926 2.00 265 385 2.03 142 150 2.00 39.3 49.6 149 Invention V3929 2.01 262 381 2.01 125 135 2.01 37.9 48.9 141 Invention V3954 2.02 244 348 2.04 135 165 2.03 24.1 35.1 134 Invention V3955 2.04 239 352 2.05 147 178 2.06 32.0 44.1 139 Invention V3956 2.05 245 354 2.06 134 150 2.05 40.7 49.3 140 Invention V3957 2.05 257 376 2.05 100 122 2.06 38.6 50.0 132 Invention V3958 2.02 246 369 2.04 107 121 2.04 40.0 50.0 131 Invention V3959 2.03 238 352 2.05 96 120 2.05 34.5 45.8 123 Invention V3960 2.03 252 370 2.05 102 118 2.05 36.9 49.3 130 Invention V3961 2.02 244 353 2.03 160 185 2.03 31.0 43.1 145 Invention V3962 2.03 243 356 2.04 108 126 2.05 34.8 46.2 129 Invention HT #920097 CL 2.00 247 373 2.00 148 167 2.01 36.6 46.9 144 Invention #F06626 HT #920097 CL 2.03 256 373 2.03 144 172 2.02 38.0 47.6 146 Invention #F06629 V3918 2.01 245 370 2.02 153 166 2.02 40.0 51.3 146 Reference V3920 2.02 251 382 1.99 167 195 2.02 38.9 49.6 152 Reference V3921 2.01 260 383 2.00 137 151 2.00 36.5 47.5 145 Reference V3922 2.05 247 373 2.03 146 154 2.04 40.3 49.3 144 Reference

Example 4

The longitudinal tensile properties of several of the steel compositions of Example 1 were tested according to the procedure of ASTM Standard E8/E8M test. In addition, the stretch-r values were tested according to the procedure of ASTM Standard E517. Ridging resistance of the compositions was also determined on a qualitative scale of 0-6, where 0 is the best and 6 is unacceptable. The results of these tests are set forth below:

TABLE 4 Longitudinal tensile properties (ASTM E8/E8M), stretch r-values, and ridging resistances. Longitudinal ASTM Tensile Gauge .2% YS UTS EL Stretch Ridging Lab ID (mm) (MPa) (MPa) (%) HRB r-bar (0-6) Remarks V3926 2.02 475 613 27.5 93.0 1.01 3 Invention 2.02 476 614 27.7 92.8 2 V3925 2.02 465 598 27.6 92.4 1.21 2 Invention 2.02 466 600 28.6 92.0 2 V3929 2.03 432 563 31.4 89.8 1.37 1 Invention 2.03 430 563 31.4 89.6 2 V3924 2.05 451 579 29.9 90.5 1.24 2 Invention 2.04 452 580 30.0 89.9 1 V3955 2.01 425 552 31.2 88.0 1.16 1 Invention 2.02 422 547 30.5 88.2 V3956 2.01 411 542 31.3 87.7 0.98 1 Invention 2.02 407 538 30.4 87.5 V3961 2.05 449 572 29.0 89.8 1.31 1 Invention 2.04 443 569 29.4 90.0 V3954 2.04 447 571 28.8 90.4 1.16 1 Invention 2.04 446 570 29.0 89.6 V3962 2.07 451 580 28.8 90.5 1.29 1 Invention 2.07 451 577 30.1 90.0 V3957 2.01 454 587 27.1 91.6 1.16 1 Invention 2.01 448 581 28.7 90.8 V3958 2.05 428 570 27.9 89.2 1.14 1 Invention 2.05 429 569 29.5 89.1 V3959 2.07 461 585 28.0 90.9 1.19 1 Invention 2.07 459 583 28.7 90.2 V3960 2.06 458 586 29.1 90.5 1.15 1 Invention 2.06 452 581 28.8 90.7 V3918 1.99 379 508 33.4 84.9 1.45 1 Reference 1.99 381 510 33.5 84.8 1 V3920 2.05 426 556 30.5 89.4 1.13 1 Reference 2.05 424 555 31.1 89.3 1 V3921 2.02 477 618 26.9 92.7 1.04 2 Reference 2.02 474 616 26.5 92.4 3 V3922 2.04 416 543 33.1 88.4 1.21 1 Reference 2.03 414 543 32.4 88.2 1

Example 4

The longitudinal tensile properties of several of the steel compositions of Example 1 were tested according to the procedure of ASTM Standard E8/E8M test. In addition, the stretch-r values were tested according to the procedure of ASTM Standard E517. Ridging resistance of the compositions was also determined on a qualitative scale of 0-6, where 0 is the best and 6 is unacceptable. The results of these tests are set forth below:

TABLE 5 Longitudinal tensile properties (ASTM E8/E8M), stretch r-values, and ridging resistances. HT #920097 Longitudinal ASTM Tensile Coil ID Gauge .2% YS UTS EL Ridging Position (mm) (MPa) (MPa) (%) HRB r-bar (0-6) Remarks 681730-02 2.01 403 534 33.1 86.3 1.22 0 Invention Head 2.01 404 535 32.6 86.2 0 681730-02 1.97 402 532 32.8 86.4 1.24 0 Invention Tail 1.97 402 532 32.6 86.3 0 681730-05 2.03 400 530 32.4 86.0 1.37 0 Invention Head 2.03 398 529 32.7 86.2 0 681730-05 2.03 404 534 32.7 86.4 1.20 0 Invention Tail 2.03 404 534 33.8 86.6 0 681727-02 1.51 405 537 31.8 86.4 1.34 0 Invention Head 1.51 406 537 31.0 86.4 0 681727-02 1.61 401 530 32.6 86.0 1.31 0 Invention Tail 1.61 401 530 32.3 86.3 0 681727-01A 1.53 398 530 31.8 85.8 1.38 0 Invention Head 1.53 401 532 32.1 86.0 0 681727-01A 1.56 401 532 31.7 86.2 1.34 0 Invention Tail 1.56 401 532 32.5 85.9 0

It will be understood various modifications may be made to this invention without departing from the spirit and scope of it. Therefore, the limits of this invention should be determined from the appended claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A ferritic stainless steel comprising the following elements by weight percent: 0.020% or less carbon 0.020% or less nitrogen 15-20% chromium 0.30% or less titanium 0.50% or less columbium 1.0-2.00% copper 1.0-1.7% silicon 0.4-1.5% manganese 0.050% or less phosphorus 0.01% or less sulfur 0.020% or less aluminum
 2. The ferritic stainless steel of claim 1, further comprising at least one of the following elements by weight percent: 3.0% or less molybdenum 0.010% or less boron 0.5% or less vanadium 1.0% or less nickel 